Based on the many millions of containers that are shipped world-wide every year, containers that go overboard are truly isolated cases. Nevertheless, it is important for the safety of crew, cargo and the environment to place special emphasis on securing cargo properly on board.
Containers carrying cargo are, of course, also exposed to the forces acting on a fully laden container ship. Every single one of them has to withstand vertical and horizontal stresses without deforming. On the one hand, there are static forces resulting from the gross weights of the containers on board during vessel motion. In addition, there are dynamic forces, such as the rolling, pitching and heaving motions of a ship and the influence of the wind.
In contrast to the containers stacked below deck that are held by cell frames – they form a counterbalance to the vessel’s movements – containers stacked on deck are completely at the mercy of these forces. They cannot be supported horizontally.
To ensure that the high stack of containers on deck does not lose its balance and individual containers are not deformed by the load applied from above, lashing and support forces as well as the permissible stacking weights have to be specified precisely. These calculations are complicated and must conform to the characteristics of the respective ship. After all, the permitted stacking weights depend on the transversal acceleration forces that differ according to the size and rolling behaviour of the vessel.
As the cargo officer of a ship, the Chief Mate is responsible for correct stowage. This is complex work since a vessel is never completely discharged – heavy containers that are to be unloaded in the next port cannot be stowed below deck. In addition, certain cargo may not be stacked on top of each other. In the case of containers with dangerous goods, minimum spacing from other containers has to be maintained. Furthermore, containers may arrive late at the port, making restacking necessary at short notice.
The cargo officer must take this into consideration
when he calculates the departure
and arrival stability of the ship with
the cargo computer according to international
stability criteria and on the basis
of the containers to be loaded and discharged,
which he is informed about by
the agent in advance via the stowage plan,
including weight and port of discharge of
each individual container. The vessel may
not depart until this has been done. The
Hansa Mare Reederei uses the EASECON
programme for this purpose.
However, the
cargo computer has to be supplied with
reliable data. To ensure containers from
exceeding the weight specified in the
stowage plan, many gantry cranes at
terminals are now equipped with weight
indicators so that an impermissibly heavy
container is noticed immediately. During
the loading operations the cargo officer
personally makes sure that the containers
are at the right place. If a 30 tons-container
is in the upper section of a stack instead
of in the lower section, this imposes
an uncalculable risk of damage.
However, even a container that is correctly
positioned based on its weight can
become a risk in a storm if it has not been
stuffed properly by the shipper and
nothing inside can shift.
Given stack heights of up to eight layers on deck, the technical scope of shipping companies and lashing gear manufacturers has nearly been exhausted. Due to high stowage, increased lifting forces occur when the ship rolls and high compressive loads act on the bottom deck container. For this reason only empty containers can be carried in the upper layers in most cases so that the centre of gravity of the vessel is not shifted upwards too far.
To be able to transport even higher stack weights, containers would have to be reinforced accordingly. The sector is already working on solutions. Additional lashing devices, such as lashing bridges that are one to two layers enabling to lash the containers in the third and fourth layer with a cross lashing, would be a tentative solution. In any case a container stack depends on meticulous and regularly monitored lashing.